茂田師兄 慈悲訓示
同德壇 · 2025.07.05 · 中英文率性進修班 at 紐約同德佛堂; the Box .docx header additionally labels the occasion 「三天法會」. The class name 率性 is the Doctrine of the Mean's 「率性之謂道」.
20250705NYtd1
三天主考 茂田師兄奉 老Φ之命降至紐約同德壇,為中英文率性進修班批下這篇沙訓。開篇四句鎮壇詩藏著一個嵌字:把每一句上聯的最後一個字連起來讀——根深者葉茂、雁鶩起瓊田、三人行我師、真理是吾兄——正是「茂田師兄」,也就是這位仙佛自己的佛號。而且每一句都在解自己所落的那個字:葉子茂盛,是因為根扎得深;田野,是飛鳥升起的地方;同行三人裡,就有我的老師;真理,是我的兄長。祂不是先報名號再說話,而是把名字拆成四句關於「怎麼學」的話。三天主考是祂在天上的職司,全篇卻一次也沒有提到;文中只出現「師兄」,而在座的一律稱作「弟妹」——這份自居於平輩的姿態,定下了整篇的口氣。鎮壇詩起手的「根深」「源遠」,出自《道德經》第五十九章結尾的「深根固柢,長生久視之道」;而本訓第一句「早服謂之重積德」,正是同一章的中間一句,一字不改。祂用同一章的尾與中,說同一件事:地面上看得見的一切,都靠底下看不見的部分撐著。緊接著又用第四十五章的「大盈若沖 其用不窮」來平衡——積得再厚也不能自滿,容器一滿就再裝不下。接下來祂講「今天坐在這裡的是誰」:天賦的明命人人共抱(「明命」出自《大學》傳一章所引《書經‧太甲》「顧諟天之明命」,不是《中庸》的天命),外面的血脈因緣各有異同,裡面那一份卻是一樣的。然後是次第:束修自好而後入壇,革面洗心而後「已不同」;改惡遷善,循至理而行。再用三個「不有」的排比說明這一切有多不容易——沒有深厚的佛緣、沒有宿世累積的德功、沒有祖上留下的積修,如何能入道、又遇明師?而後一句把責任分得清清楚楚:「道在師傳修在己」——道是傳給你的,修是你自己的事,沒有人能代勞。語氣到中段轉緊:不認自己的真性,就談不上入手,也談不上訓文所說的「面無生」;「此身不向今生渡」,再等來日,機就難逢了。智士仁人不要逡巡,不要等順風才起帆;不論在聖在凡,考驗都是讓人往上登的階梯——這句話由主考說出來,分量不同:出考題的人本來就盼你考得過。接著眼光放遠:天橋、法舟都已搭設,天人共沐法喜,而船不是給自己一個人坐的,要迎接後繼者同入至善。然後是兩道防線:道有宗旨,不可旁騖;道是真能兌現的,不是畫在紙上的餅。而守住這一切的辦法,竟是「自信自重還自愛」——這份天賦既然如此難得,就該拿相稱的態度對待它。最後一段講定力與傳續:八風不動、君子固窮,一佛一儒,說的其實是同一件事——外面怎麼變,裡面那根定盤針不動;而德行如風,風過草偃,能起這樣的作用,肩上的責任也就重了。於是祂踮起腳跟、伸長脖子(翹企),盼望在座每一位都能貫徹始終。臨別的叮嚀很實在:把規戒放在心中;謹言慎行要貫徹於二六時中——一天十二個時辰、不分場合,功夫一斷就不算功夫。「畢竟升降會不同」,話沒有多說,人人都聽得懂。而祂最後沒有騰雲而去,是「隱身一旁立」——正是主考的姿態:不出聲,但不離開。整篇圍著一個「根」字轉,而祂的名字,就寫在「根深者葉茂」的最後一個字上。
Before he says his name aloud, he has already written it down the page. Each of the four opening lines closes on one character of the speaker’s own 佛號 — 茂, 田, 師, 兄 — and read straight down they spell Elder Brother Maotian, which is exactly what the next breath announces. The device does more than sign: every line defines the character it lands on. The leaves are lush because the root runs deep. The field is what the birds rise from. Any one of three walking together is my teacher. Truth is my elder brother. The record attributes this teaching to the Chief Examiner of the Three Heavens, an office that grades — but the office appears nowhere in the text. What appears is 師兄, elder brother, addressing the assembly throughout as younger brothers and sisters, and saying of truth that he is forever collating himself against it the way a scribe checks a manuscript against its exemplar, one reader speaking and one listening, character by character. He even regrets, in the third line, that his admiration came so late. The opening also plants the teaching’s root: deep root and far spring are the closing images of chapter 59 of the 道德經, and the very first line of the main teaching returns to the middle of that same chapter and quotes it word for word — to submit early is what is called laying up virtue layer upon layer. Nothing visible above ground is the point; and chapter 45’s paradox arrives immediately after, so that no one mistakes accumulation for display. Then he turns to the room. What everyone holds in common is the bright mandate Heaven endowed — the Great Learning’s 明命, a light handed over that can be attended to or neglected — while bloodline and conditioned affinity differ, and are the same. From there the instructions arrive in the order a person actually meets them: discipline yourself before the threshold; then inside, the face changed and the heart washed — and note the tense, which is not you will be different but you are already not the same. The centre of the teaching is a hammering triple negative: were there not an affinity with the Buddha, were there not merit heaped up across former lives, were there not the cultivation your forebears left standing — how could you enter the Dao, how could you meet an enlightened master? You are in this room on borrowed capital. And then the pivot that turns comfort into demand: the Dao lies in the master’s transmitting; the cultivating lies in you. He presses until it is urgent — the heart-method of nature and principle, have you understood it, have you walked it? — and borrows a well-worn verse to say that if this body is not ferried across in this present life, the moment will be hard to meet. Then his office finally shows, in a single word: let the trials drive you to press on and climb. 考 is the character in his own title, and the Chief Examiner has just told the assembly what the examinations are for. They are not there to sort you; they are there to move you. Immediately the imagery turns generous — the bridge to Heaven raised, the Dharma-boat set in place — and the arrangement is not for one person: welcome those who come after, and let them too come to rest in the highest good, closing an arc the bright mandate opened twenty lines earlier. He guards it against two failures, dispersion and unreality (it is not empty words, a painted cake), and then prescribes something that reads startlingly modern: trust yourself, respect yourself, and cherish yourself besides. The logic is consistent — a person carrying a mandate they did not earn and cannot return is not entitled to think little of what they carry. The last movement is about weather. Unmoved by the eight winds, able to hold firm when hemmed in: Buddhist imperturbability and Confucian steadfastness welded into one seven-character line — and the wind of virtue it raises blows straight into the next line, where the wind passes and the grass bends. Then the most exposed moment in the teaching: he cranes his neck and stands on tiptoe, hoping his students finish. He closes by handing over the small daily thing — careful in speech, cautious in conduct, at every hour, through the day and through the night — declines to say who rises and who falls, and steps out of the way: now I hide myself and stand off to one side, keeping to my duty. In a 沙訓, a teaching written character by character with a stylus in a tray of sand, what stops is the stylus. He laughs once, and the writing ends.
About this editionAI-assisted study edition — the Chinese original is canonical; English is pending our elders’ review.
鎮壇詩 Verse to Settle the Altar · recited
「表」是顯現在外的那一面。根扎得深,葉子才長得茂盛;源頭夠遠,水流才能綿長——外面看得見的氣度、成就、影響力,都不是憑空長出來的,是底下那看不見的根與源撐起來的。這兩句承《道德經》第五十九章的結尾而來:「是謂深根固柢,長生久視之道。」而本訓第一句又取同一章的中間一句,整篇教義是從同一個源頭流出來的。另外,鎮壇詩四個單數句的末字連讀即是佛號「茂田師兄」;這一句落在「茂」字上,而落在哪個字,那一句就在解那個字——葉子茂盛,正因為根深。
表 is the side of a thing that shows. Roots that run deep are why leaves grow lush; a spring far off is why the current runs long — the bearing, the achievement, the influence anyone can see never grew out of nothing, but is held up by the root and the source that cannot be seen. Both images close chapter 59 of the Daodejing: 「是謂深根固柢,長生久視之道」, deep root and firm taproot, the way of long life and enduring vision — and the first line of the main teaching returns to the middle of that same chapter, so the whole teaching flows from one source. One more thing: reading the last character of each odd line of the 鎮壇詩 straight down spells the speaker’s own 佛號, 茂田師兄, Elder Brother Maotian. This line lands on 茂, “lush” — and whichever character a line lands on, that is the character the line unpacks. The leaves are lush precisely because the root runs deep.
雁和鶩都是尋常水鳥,卻是從美玉一般的田野上飛起來的;蛟龍盤踞在翠綠的島嶼上,還沒有騰空而去。「蟠」是盤曲、伏著不動的樣子。這一聯不必解得太死,但感受很清楚:看似平凡的地方,藏著不平凡的東西;有能飛的,也有還沒飛起來的。放在整篇教義的開頭,這是在提醒在座的每一位——你身上本來就有那份東西,只是還蟠著。本句落在嵌字的「田」上:田野,正是飛鳥升起的地方。
Wild geese and ducks are ordinary water birds, yet they lift from fields of jade; the flood-dragon lies coiled on the emerald isle and has not yet risen. 蟠 is the shape of something curled and lying still. Do not press this couplet into a single meaning — the feel of it is plain enough: ordinary-looking places hold what is not ordinary, and some things can already fly while others have not yet risen. Placed at the head of the teaching, it is a reminder to everyone in the hall — what you are looking for is already in you; it is only still coiled. This line lands on the acrostic character 田, the field: the very ground the birds rise from.
上半句直接用《論語‧述而》的名言:「三人行,必有我師焉。擇其善者而從之,其不善者而改之。」學習的對象不必是聖人——好的拿來效法,不好的拿來對照反省,身邊每一個人都是。下半句的「服」字要記住,因為本訓第一句「早服謂之重積德」用的正是同一個字:沒有人是一開始就肯低頭的,而遲一步低頭,就遲一步積德。本句落在嵌字的「師」上。
The first half quotes the Analects (述而) directly: 「三人行,必有我師焉。擇其善者而從之,其不善者而改之」 — where three walk together, one of them is my teacher; take what is good in them and follow it, take what is not and correct yourself by it. What you learn from need not be a sage; the good is a model, the bad is a mirror, and everyone near you qualifies. Hold on to the character 服 in the second half, because the first line of the main teaching, 「早服謂之重積德」, uses that same character: nobody yields at the outset, and every step late in yielding is a step late in laying up virtue. This line lands on the acrostic character 師, teacher.
「讎斠」是很古雅的一個詞,出自漢代整理古籍的傳統——《漢書》記載河間獻王把收得的先秦古書一一「校讎」,就是一個人讀、一個人聽,逐字比對異同,把訛誤改正過來;西漢劉向父子整理皇家藏書,開創的正是這門「校讎學」。所以「與之常讎斠」不是把真理供起來拜,而是常常拿真理來校對自己:我今天說的這句話、做的這件事,跟真理對得上嗎?哪裡有出入?這是一種很嚴謹、很不客氣的功夫,一輩子都在做。本句落在嵌字的「兄」上;而第三聯的「我師」與這一聯的「吾兄」合起來,恰好就是「師兄」——不擺老師的架子,也不作長輩的姿態,而是以一位走在前面的同修自居。這個身分,決定了底下整篇本訓的口氣。
讎斠 (chóu jiào) is a deliberately antique word, from the Han practice of putting old books in order — the History of the Han records the Prince of Hejian collating the pre-Qin texts he had gathered: one person reads aloud, another listens, and the two compare character by character and correct what is corrupt; the collation scholarship founded by Liu Xiang and his son over the imperial library is exactly this discipline. So 「與之常讎斠」 is not enshrining truth to be worshipped — it is taking truth down and checking yourself against it, constantly: this thing I said today, this thing I did — does it match? Where does it diverge? That is exacting, unflattering work, and it lasts a lifetime. The line lands on the acrostic character 兄, elder brother; and 我師 in the third couplet plus 吾兄 in this one make 師兄 — no teacher’s airs, no elder’s posture, but a fellow cultivator a little further down the same road. That standing sets the tone for everything that follows.
這四聯八句是開訓之前定調的詩,也是一道暗門:把每一單數句的末字連讀——茂、田、師、兄——正是說法者自己的佛號,而且每一句都在解自己所落的那個字。第一聯以根與源立骨:葉之茂、流之長,都是底下看不見的部分撐起來的,而「表」字點明,外面呈現的一切只是顯象。這兩句承《道德經》第五十九章結尾的「深根固柢,長生久視之道」而來,也預告了本訓開篇將回到同一章的中間一句。第二聯是一幅畫面:尋常水鳥從瓊田飛起,蛟龍卻還蟠伏在翠島上——能飛的與未飛的並置,提醒座中每一位,那份東西本來就在身上,只是還蟠著。第三聯用《論語‧述而》「三人行,必有我師焉」,把可學的對象放回身邊每一個人,末句「嘆服之不早」則是一聲遲來的自省;這個「服」字,正是本訓第一句「早服」的伏筆。第四聯以「讎斠」收——那是古人校書的功夫,一人讀、一人聽,逐字比對異同——真理不是供起來拜的,是要常常拿來校對自己的。四聯讀畢,「我師」與「吾兄」恰合成「師兄」:說法的位置從一開始就不設在高處,而是走在前面的同修。
This opening round settles the hall and, in the same four couplets, writes the speaker’s own name down the page: read the last character of each odd line and they spell 茂田師兄, Elder Brother Maotian — and every line defines the character it lands on. The first couplet lays the root: leaves come out full and a current runs long only because something deep and far back is holding them up, and 表 marks the visible growth as the sign of what cannot be seen. Those are the closing images of chapter 59 of the 道德經, the chapter whose middle clause will open the main teaching — one chapter quoted from its end and from its middle to make a single point. The second couplet sets a picture beside it: ordinary water-birds lifting off fields of jade while the flood-dragon still lies coiled on the emerald isle — what can fly and what has not yet flown, held in one frame. The third borrows the Analects’ where three walk together, one of them is my teacher, putting the teacher back among the people beside you, and closes on a late-arriving regret; the 服 of that admiration is the same 服 that opens the main teaching as submitting early. The fourth takes truth as an elder brother and 讎斠, collating, as the practice — not truth enshrined and worshipped, but truth used continually to check one’s own reading against, character by character. Read together, 我師 and 吾兄 make 師兄: the voice that follows speaks not from above but from a step further along the same road.
吾乃 Who I Am · recited
這是臨壇的表明。自報家門用的是佛號,不是天上的官銜,語氣上等於先把架子放下了。「奉命」是承著老Φ的旨意而來,不是自己想來就來——這一方面說明了這場教誨的分量,一方面也說明它不是偶然;「塵紅」就是紅塵,指這個充滿變動與煩惱的人間。進門先向上參叩皇Φ,然後才回過頭來對眾人說話:先行禮,再說話,這本身就是給人看的一課。稱在座為「弟妹」,而不是徒兒、不是眾生,與鎮壇詩裡「我師」「吾兄」的自我定位完全一致。最後「平下心氣再表衷」是一句很實在的叮嚀:心浮氣躁的時候聽什麼都聽不進去,話再好也是白說——所以在整篇教義開始之前,先要人把呼吸放緩、把心定下來。
This is the arrival declared. The self-identification uses the personal 佛號, not the celestial office — which in tone amounts to setting the rank down at the door. 奉命 means coming under the Eternal Mother’s decree rather than of one’s own choosing: it states the weight of what is about to be taught, and that nothing about the occasion is accidental. 塵紅 is the red dust — this human world of change and trouble. Inside the door, homage is paid upward to the Sovereign Mother first, and only then does the speaking turn to the assembly: courtesy before words, which is itself a lesson set out to be watched. The assembly is called 弟妹, younger brothers and sisters — not disciples, not sentient beings — exactly matching the 我師 and 吾兄 of the opening verse. And 「平下心氣再表衷」 is thoroughly practical advice: nothing gets in through an agitated heart, and the best words are wasted on it — so before the teaching begins, slow the breath and let the heart settle.
臨壇的自我表明只有短短一段,卻把整篇的姿態定住了。所報的是佛號而非天上的職銜,語氣先把架子放下;奉命而來,說明這場教誨不是興之所至,而是承著老Φ的旨意。進門的第一件事不是說話,是先向皇Φ參叩——行禮在先,本身就是一課。轉過身來問候的對象是「弟妹」,不是徒兒、不是眾生,與鎮壇詩「我師」「吾兄」的自處完全一致。最後「平下心氣再表衷」是最實在的一句叮嚀:心浮氣躁的時候,話再好也聽不進去,所以在整篇道理展開之前,先要人把呼吸放緩、把心定下來——這也是聽訓的第一層功夫。
This short self-introduction sets the posture the whole teaching keeps. The name announced is the personal 佛號, Elder Brother Maotian, not an office — whatever authority is held gets set down at the door. Coming bearing the Eternal Mother’s decree marks the teaching as commissioned rather than occasional; and the first act on entering is not speech but homage before the Sovereign Mother’s countenance, which is itself the opening instruction. The assembly is then addressed as 弟妹, younger brothers and sisters — the same sibling footing the verse established with my teacher and my elder brother. The closing line asks for something practical before anything else is said: settle the heart, quiet the breath. A restless hearer takes in nothing, however good the words — so the first work of receiving a teaching is done before the teaching begins.
本訓 The Teaching · recited (27 couplet-lines in strict 7+7, then the closing formula)
開篇一句,兩個半句各引《道德經》一章,而且都不加說明,直接就用。前半句出自第五十九章:「治人事天,莫若嗇。夫唯嗇,是謂早服;早服謂之重積德。」「嗇」是愛惜、收斂,不浪費自己的精神;能做到這一點,就叫作「早服」——早早地順服於道、回到道上來,而這種早早的順服,就是一層一層厚厚地積德。後半句出自第四十五章:「大盈若沖,其用不窮。」「沖」通「盅」,是空的容器;最飽滿的狀態,看起來反而像是空的,正因為空著,它的作用才用不完。兩句合起來是整篇教義的總綱:要早,也要虛。積德要趁早,而積得再厚也不能自滿——一自滿,那個容器就再也裝不進東西了。
Two hemistichs, each quoting a chapter of the Daodejing outright and without introduction. The first is from chapter 59: 「治人事天,莫若嗇。夫唯嗇,是謂早服;早服謂之重積德」. 嗇 is husbanding, sparing, not squandering your own spirit; do that, and it is called 早服 — submitting early, returning early to the Dao — and that early submission is virtue laid up layer on layer. The second is from chapter 45: 「大盈若沖,其用不窮」; 沖 stands for 盅, an empty vessel — the fullest state looks empty, and because it is empty its usefulness never runs out. Together they are the whole teaching’s governing rule: be early, and stay empty. Lay up virtue soon, and however thick it grows, never be satisfied with it — the moment you are full, the vessel can take nothing more.
從這一句起,接連五句講的是「今天坐在這裡的是誰」。另外留意「專攻」的「攻」字:本訓最後一句「守吾職責助道攻」用的正是同一個字,一頭一尾扣在一起——你們專攻,旁邊有人幫著攻。
From here five consecutive lines answer a single question: who is it sitting here today? Note also the 攻 of 專攻 — the last line of the main teaching, 「守吾職責助道攻」, uses that same character, clasping the end back to the beginning: you press the work, and someone stands alongside pressing too.
「明命」出自《大學》傳文第一章,引《書經‧太甲》的話說「顧諟天之明命」——時時刻刻照看著上天賦予的那份光明的稟命,不要讓它蒙塵(不是《中庸》的「天命之謂性」)。這份天賦的明命,大家是「合同抱」的,也就是共同抱持著同一份;不管你來自東南西北中的哪一方,這一點沒有差別。
明命 comes from the Great Learning, commentary chapter 1, quoting the Book of Documents’ 太甲: 「顧諟天之明命」 — keep constant watch over the bright mandate Heaven gave, and do not let it gather dust. (Not the Doctrine of the Mean’s 天命之謂性.) This endowed bright mandate is 合同抱 — held jointly, one and the same for all; whichever of east, south, west, north or the center you come from, in this there is no difference.
這一句說的是外在的差異:造化把人分散到各處,各人的家世血脈、各人的因緣,有同也有異。要和上一句合起來看才完整——外面看起來差別很大,裡面那一份是一樣的。
This line is about outward difference: creation scatters people into every place, and each person’s family and bloodline, each person’s conditioned affinity, differ and are alike. It is only complete when read together with the line before it — outwardly the differences are large; inwardly, that one thing is the same.
把那份「一樣」的來歷講明白了:要知道天上有天理在,這份天理是隨著人降生到紅塵時,一併賦到人身上的。不是修來的,是本來就帶著的。
Here the origin of that sameness is stated plainly: know that Heaven holds the principle of Heaven within it, and that this principle is endowed into a person as they come down into the red dust. It is not something cultivation earns; it was carried in from the start.
既然人人都帶著,那差別在哪裡?就在這一句:各人有各人的業,也有各人所發的願力;而不論是在聖業上還是在凡塵的日子裡,要拿出來的都是同一樣東西——誠。這裡沒有把聖與凡分成兩個世界,反而是說:兩邊都要真心,不能在佛堂裡一個樣、出了門又一個樣。
If everyone carries it, where does the difference lie? In this line: each has their own work and karma, and their own power of vow; and whether in sacred work or in the ordinary days of the world, what has to be produced is the same one thing — sincerity. Sacred and mundane are not split into two worlds here; the point is the opposite, that both sides require a true heart. One face at the altar and another outside the door will not do.
「束修」的本義出自《論語‧述而》:「自行束脩以上,吾未嘗無誨焉。」束脩本是十條乾肉紮成一束,是古代學生拜師的一份薄禮;只要肯帶著這份最微薄的禮來求學,孔子沒有不教的。後來這個詞轉出另一層意思:「束身修行」,也就是約束自己、修整自己的品行。這裡用的是後一層意思,再加上「自好」——潔身自好,自己看重自己。合起來就是:要先把自己收拾乾淨,才走進這個壇地。「革面」出自《周易》革卦上六「小人革面」,是把舊的面貌整個變掉;「洗心」出自《易‧繫辭上》「聖人以此洗心,退藏於密」,是把心裡的積垢洗淨。值得注意的是,一般成語說「洗心革面」,這裡卻把「革面」擺在前頭——先從外在的行為樣貌改起,再洗到心裡去,倒也是修行最實際的次第:真要等心先乾淨了才動手改,多半是永遠不動手。
The root sense of 束修 is from the Analects (述而): 「自行束脩以上,吾未嘗無誨焉」. 束脩 was ten strips of dried meat bound in a bundle, the modest gift an ancient student brought to a teacher; anyone willing to come and study bearing even that slightest offering, Confucius taught. Later the word turned to a second sense, 束身修行 — binding and refining one’s own conduct — and it is the later sense that is used here, together with 自好, keeping oneself clean and holding oneself worth something. Put together: get yourself in order first, then step onto this altar ground. 革面 comes from the Book of Changes, 革 hexagram, top six 「小人革面」 — changing the old outward aspect entirely; 洗心 from the Great Commentary, 「聖人以此洗心,退藏於密」 — washing the silt out of the heart. Worth noticing: the common idiom runs 洗心革面, but here 革面 is placed first — begin with outward conduct and appearance, then wash inward, which is in fact the most workable order in cultivation: wait for the heart to be clean before you act, and mostly you never act.
「改惡遷善」的骨架在《周易》益卦的象辭:「君子以見善則遷,有過則改。」益卦的卦象是風上有雷,風雷相激、彼此增益,象徵著向上增長的力量;見到善的立刻跟上,發現錯的立刻改掉,中間不留猶豫的餘地。這樣循著至理走,才對得起下半句:真正的道,古往今來都是難遇的。這不是客套話,而是要人掂一掂手上這件事的分量。
The frame of 改惡遷善 is the image-text of the Book of Changes’ 益 hexagram: 「君子以見善則遷,有過則改」. The 益 image is thunder beneath wind, wind and thunder striking against each other and each increasing the other — the figure of force that grows upward; see the good and follow it at once, find the fault and correct it at once, leaving no room in between for hesitation. Only by following the ultimate principle that way do you do justice to the second half: the true Dao, in ancient days and now, is hard to come upon. That is not a courtesy — it asks you to weigh in your hand what you are holding.
一連三個「不有」(延續到下一句),是一個很重的排比。沒有深厚的佛緣,沒有累世積下的德與功——這幾句要順著聽,重點不在「你有多幸運」,而在「這件事有多不容易」。
Three 不有 in a row (running on into the next line), a heavy parallel construction. No deep and thick affinity with the Buddha, no merit and virtue heaped up across former lives — hear these clauses in sequence, and hear where the weight falls: not on how fortunate you are, but on how far from easy this was.
三個「不有」在這裡收束:沒有祖上留下的修為,怎麼可能入了道、又遇上一位真正明白的老師?不要當成宿命論來聽——今天能坐在這裡,背後是很長一段看不見的累積在托著;既然是這麼難得才換來的,就不能隨手糟蹋。這正好回應了鎮壇詩第一聯:葉子茂盛,是因為根扎得深;你今天走到這裡,也是因為底下有根。
The third 不有 closes here: without the cultivation your forebears accumulated and left standing, how could you have entered the Dao and met a master who genuinely understands? Do not hear it as fatalism — that you can be sitting here today rests on a long stretch of invisible accumulation holding you up; and something got at that cost cannot be squandered offhand. This answers the opening verse’s first couplet exactly: the leaves are lush because the root runs deep, and you have come this far because there is root beneath you.
一句話把責任分清楚了:道是老師傳給你的,但修,是你自己的事,沒有人能代勞。既然明白了這一點,怎麼還會跟從前一樣糊裡糊塗?
One line divides the responsibility cleanly: the Dao is transmitted to you by a master, but the cultivating is your own affair, and nobody can do it in your place. Once that is understood, how could anyone go on as muddled as before?
「流宕不返」的說法可追到《後漢書》的「流宕忘反」:被外物牽著走,走到最後心志再也轉不回來。那樣的日子已經過去了;從今以後把道抱在懷裡,切切實實地照著做。
The phrase 流宕不返 traces to the History of the Later Han’s 流宕忘反: dragged along by things until the will can no longer turn back. Those days are past; from now on, hold the Dao in your arms and carry it out in earnest.
道要在自己身上實踐,那麼——你對這套講心性義理的功夫,究竟是明白了、也做到了嗎?這是一個問句,不是一句斷語,語氣是要人停下來自問的。
The Dao is to be practiced in your own person — so: this work of nature, principle and the heart-method, have you actually understood it, and have you actually done it? This is a question, not a verdict; the tone is asking you to stop and put it to yourself.
正因為還不夠明白,才需要進到班裡來,把道理研究清楚。這一班名為「率性進修班」,「率性」二字出自《中庸》開篇:「天命之謂性,率性之謂道,修道之謂教。」上天賦予的叫作性,順著這個性去走就是道,把這條路修整明白了就是教——班名本身,就是這篇教義所講的那條路。而最後的驗收標準是「真知真行」:知得真、行得真,聖賢就是這樣成的,少了任何一邊都不算。
It is precisely because understanding is not yet enough that one enters the class and studies the principles through. The class is the 率性進修班, and 率性 comes from the opening of the Doctrine of the Mean: 「天命之謂性,率性之謂道,修道之謂教」 — what Heaven endows is called nature; following that nature is the Dao; making that road clear is teaching. The class’s own name is the road this teaching describes. And the final standard is 真知真行: know truly, act truly — that is how sages and worthies are made, and short of either half it does not count.
語氣到這裡開始轉緊。你自己若不肯認取那個真正的本性,那還談什麼下手處、談什麼「面無生」?「無生」本是佛家極深的道理,講一切法本來不生不滅;在這脈修道傳承裡,也用「無生」來稱那本無生滅的根源,也就是老Φ。「面無生」就是修成之後回到根源、面見老Φ——那是整條路的終點。可是連自己的本性都不認,終點自然無從談起。
The tone tightens from here. If you yourself will not take up and acknowledge your true nature, what talk can there be of where to lay hold, or of 面無生? 無生, the Unborn, is originally a very deep Buddhist teaching — that all things are of themselves neither arising nor ceasing; and in this Dao cultivation lineage the same word is used for the source that has never arisen or ceased, the Eternal Mother. So 面無生 is read as returning to the source when cultivation is complete and standing before the Eternal Mother — the end of the whole road. But refuse to acknowledge your own nature, and there is no destination to speak of.
這一句借用了一首流傳極廣的偈語:「人身難得今已得,佛法難聞今已聞;此身不向今生度,更向何生度此身。」生為人身極難得,能聽到正法更難得;這一生若不把自己渡過去,還要等哪一生?留意訓文寫的是「渡」而不是「度」,這個字用得好:渡是過水,前面是苦海,後面正要說到「法舟」,一條水路就這樣接上了。真要等到來日,那個機會就難再遇上了。
This line borrows a very widely circulated verse: 「人身難得今已得,佛法難聞今已聞;此身不向今生度,更向何生度此身」 — birth in a human body is hard to come by, and hearing the true Dharma harder still; if you do not ferry yourself across in this life, which life are you waiting for? Note that the teaching writes 渡, “ferry over water,” and not 度. The character is well chosen: ahead lies the sea of suffering, and 法舟, the Dharma-boat, is about to be named — a waterway is joined up across the two lines. Wait for days to come, and the chance will be hard to meet.
「逡巡」是徘徊不前、猶豫退縮的樣子,《史記》裡屢見這個詞,形容的是心裡有顧忌、腳步就邁不出去。有智慧、有仁心的人,不要再這樣徘徊了。而「成道勿等順帆風」這句話很實際:不要等到一帆風順才來修道——順風從來不會自己來,等順風的人只是在等一個永遠不到的日子。
逡巡 is the look of hanging back, hesitating, drawing away; the word recurs throughout the Records of the Grand Historian for scruples in the heart that keep the feet from moving. Those who are wise, those who are humane, should hesitate no longer. And 「成道勿等順帆風」 is thoroughly practical: do not wait for smooth sailing before you cultivate — a following wind never comes of itself, and whoever waits for it is only waiting for a day that never arrives.
不管是在聖業上還是在凡塵裡,考驗都是讓自己往上走的那道階梯,不是攔路的石頭。這一句的分量在於它從誰口中說出:三天主考是這位仙佛在天上的職司,考驗正是份內的事。這不是在旁邊說風涼話,而是告訴大家考題的用意——出考題的人,本來就希望你考得過去。
Whether in sacred work or in the red dust, the trials are the stair that takes you upward, not the stone in the road. The weight of the line lies in whose mouth it comes from: the record attributes this teaching to the Chief Examiner of the Three Heavens, so the examinations are that office’s own business. This is not commentary from the sidelines — it tells the assembly what the questions are for. Whoever sets the paper wants you to pass.
這裡把眼光從自己身上移開了。「法舟」是佛門的老譬喻:生死輪迴是這一岸的苦海,解脫是彼岸,能載人渡過去的法門就是那條船,也叫「慈航」。天橋、法舟都搭設起來了,於是天上與人間共同沉浸在「法喜」之中——法喜是聞法、行法時心裡生出的那份清淨喜悅,跟感官的快樂不一樣,是從明白裡長出來的。
Here the gaze moves off oneself. 法舟 is an old Buddhist figure: birth-and-death is the sea of suffering on this shore, liberation is the far shore, and the teaching that can carry beings across is the boat — also called 慈航, the boat of compassion. Bridge and boat are both set in place, and so Heaven and humankind are steeped together in 法喜, Dharma-joy — the clean gladness that rises in hearing and practising the Dharma, unlike the pleasure of the senses because it grows out of understanding.
船搭起來不是給自己一個人坐的:要「迎接後繼之來者」,把後面來的人接上船,讓他們也能安住在「至善」之中。「至善」出自《大學》:「大學之道,在明明德,在親民,在止於至善。」自己明白了還不夠,要讓別人也明白,最後大家一同安住在那個最圓滿的境地——這才是《大學》講的完整次第,也是這條船真正的用途。
The boat was not raised to carry one passenger: 「迎接後繼之來者」 — bring those who come after aboard, so that they too may rest in 至善. 至善 comes from the Great Learning: 「大學之道,在明明德,在親民,在止於至善」. Understanding it yourself is not enough; others must come to understand, until everyone rests together in that most complete state — which is the Great Learning’s own full sequence, and the boat’s real use.
「旁騖」的「騖」本指馬奔馳,引申為追求;旁騖就是把力氣分到旁邊不相干的事上去。荀子在《勸學》裡舉梧鼠為例:牠會飛、會爬、會游、會挖洞、會跑,五樣本事樣樣都會,卻樣樣不精,最後還是「窮」;所以他的結論是「故君子結於一也」——君子把心思結在一處。道有它的宗旨,認定了就不要東張西望。而且這條路「不是空言畫什餅」——畫在紙上的餅再像也不能吃,禪門講得更直接:「畫餅不可充飢。」這是一句保證:這件事是真能兌現的,不是拿一張餅的圖給你看。
The 騖 of 旁騖 originally means a horse at a gallop, and by extension pursuit; 旁騖 is spending your strength sideways on what does not belong to the matter. The Xunzi’s 勸學 offers the 梧鼠 as its example: it can fly, climb, swim, burrow and run — five skills, not one of them mastered, and it ends 窮, at an impasse; hence the conclusion 「故君子結於一也」, the noble person binds the mind to one thing. The Dao has its governing aim; once you have settled on it, stop looking around. And this road is 「不是空言畫什餅」 — a cake painted on paper, however lifelike, cannot be eaten; the Chan masters put it more bluntly still: 「畫餅不可充飢」, a painted cake cannot relieve hunger. The line is a guarantee: this can actually be made good on. Nobody is holding up a picture of a cake.
自信、自重、自愛,三個詞都從「自」字起。這不是要人自大,正好相反:一個真正看重自己的人,才捨不得糟蹋自己。前面說了佛緣、宿世、祖上的積累有多不容易,這裡就順勢接上——既然你身上這份東西這麼難得,就該拿出相稱的態度來對待它。做到了,光榮自然顯在世上,不必去爭。
Trust yourself, respect yourself, cherish yourself — all three words begin with 自. This is not an invitation to conceit; it is the opposite. Only someone who genuinely values himself cannot bear to squander himself. The lines before spoke of how hard-won the affinity with the Buddha, the former lives and the forebears’ accumulation all were, and this follows straight on — since what you carry is that rare, meet it with an attitude of the same size. Do that, and glory shows in the world of itself, without needing to be contended for.
「八風」是佛家的說法,指八種最能煽動人心的境界:利、衰、毀、譽、稱、譏、苦、樂,四順四逆。得意的時候不飄,失意的時候不垮,被人捧、被人踩都動不了,這就是「八風不動」,《五燈會元》裡說「對五欲八風不動,不被見聞覺知所縛」。而「固窮」出自《論語‧衛靈公》:孔子一行人在陳國斷了糧,跟隨的弟子都餓病了,子路很不高興地問:「君子亦有窮乎?」孔子答:「君子固窮,小人窮斯濫矣。」這裡的「窮」不是貧窮,是走投無路的困境;君子在困境中依然守得住自己,小人一到困境就什麼都做得出來。一佛一儒,講的其實是同一件事:外面怎麼變,裡面那根定盤針不動。做到了,才配稱作一位樹立德風的君子。
八風 is the Buddhist term for the eight states that stir a person most: gain and loss, disgrace and honor, praise and blame, pain and pleasure — four running with you and four against. Not floating up when things go well, not collapsing when they do not, unmoved whether you are lifted up or trodden on: that is 八風不動, attested verbatim in the 五燈會元, a Chan lamp history — 「對五欲八風不動,不被見聞覺知所縛」. And 固窮 comes from the Analects (衛靈公): stranded in Chen with the food gone and the disciples sick with hunger, Zilu asked in irritation, 「君子亦有窮乎?」 — does a noble person also come to such straits? Confucius answered, 「君子固窮,小人窮斯濫矣」. 窮 here is not poverty but being hemmed in with nowhere to turn; the noble person holds himself in it, the small person breaks loose and does anything at all. One Buddhist and one Confucian, saying the same thing: however things change outside, the compass needle inside does not move. Do that, and only then does the name fit — a noble person who raises a wind of virtue.
上一句結在「立德風」,這一句就從那個「風」字接下來,一氣呵成。「風行草偃」出自《論語‧顏淵》:季康子問孔子,把無道的人殺掉來成全有道的,怎麼樣?孔子說,治理國家哪裡用得著殺人——「君子之德風,小人之德草,草上之風,必偃」:在上位者的德行像風,百姓的德行像草,風吹過去,草自然就順著倒了。德行的感化,是不必動手的。所以「承任重」——能起這樣的風化作用,肩上擔的責任也就重了;影響力有多大,責任就有多大。「翹企」是踮起腳跟、伸長脖子盼望的樣子——《後漢書》就有「翹企延頸,待望讎敵」的用法,古書裡也常作「延頸企踵」——盼望的是在座每一位都能「貫始終」——有頭有尾,一以貫之。這是整篇本訓裡語氣最軟的一句:前面講了那麼多道理,最後落到一份殷切的張望上。
The previous line ended on 立德風, and this line takes up that 風 and runs on without a break. 風行草偃 comes from the Analects (顏淵): Ji Kangzi asked Confucius about putting the lawless to death in order to promote the lawful, and Confucius replied that governing has no use for killing — 「君子之德風,小人之德草,草上之風,必偃」: the virtue of those above is wind, the virtue of the people is grass, and when the wind passes over, the grass bends of itself. The transforming power of virtue lays no hand on anyone. Hence 承任重 — able to raise such a wind, you carry a heavier charge on your shoulders; influence and responsibility are exactly the same size. 翹企 is the posture of rising on the heels with the neck stretched out in hope — the compound is itself classical, 後漢書 having 「翹企延頸,待望讎敵」, with 延頸企踵 the commoner form — and the one standing on tiptoe here is the speaker, hoping that everyone present may 貫始終 — carry it through from first to last, one thread from beginning to end. It is the softest line in the whole main teaching: after all that principle, it comes to rest on an earnest craning look.
今天的話就說到這裡。把這些規勸戒律「放心中」——注意是放在心裡,不是記在紙上。
Today’s words come only this far. Set these cautions and rules 放心中 — and note that it is inside the heart, not down on paper.
「謹言慎行」的分寸,《禮記‧緇衣》說得清楚:「言必慮其所終,而行必稽其所敝」——話出口之前先想想它會導向什麼結果,事情做之前先查查它可能帶來什麼弊病。「二六時中」是禪門常用的話:古人一天分十二個時辰,白天六個、夜裡六個,合稱二六時;《碧巖錄》裡說「須是自己二六時中,打辦精神」。所以這一句的重點在「二六中」三個字——謹言慎行不是在佛堂裡的規矩,是一天十二個時辰、不分場合的功夫,功夫一斷就不算功夫。至於下半句「畢竟升降會不同」,語氣忽然放重了:說到最後,各人是升是降,終究是不一樣的。沒有多說一個字,但那個「畢竟」擺在那裡,人人都聽得懂。
The measure of 謹言慎行 is set out plainly in the Book of Rites (緇衣): 「言必慮其所終,而行必稽其所敝」 — before a word leaves your mouth, consider where it will end; before an act, examine what harm it may bring. 二六時中 is a common Chan phrase: the ancients divided a day into twelve double-hours, six in daylight and six at night, together the “twice six” — the full twenty-four, day and night, unbroken; the Blue Cliff Record has 「須是自己二六時中,打辦精神」. So the weight of the line falls on those three characters 二六中 — care in speech and conduct is not a rule for the altar hall but a practice through every hour and in every setting, and a practice that breaks is no practice. As for the second half, 「畢竟升降會不同」, the tone suddenly bears down: when all is said, whether a person rises or falls will in the end not be the same. Not one further word is spent on it, but 畢竟 is left sitting there, and everyone understands.
臨走前沒有騰雲而去,而是「隱身一旁立」:把身形隱起來,站在旁邊——這正是主考的姿態,考試的時候,監考的人不會走開,只是不出聲。「守吾職責」是守住份內的事,「助道攻」是幫著大家在道上用功精進。而這個「攻」字,正是本訓第二句「探討真諦更專攻」的那個「攻」;一頭一尾用同一個字扣上,等於說:你們專攻,我在旁邊幫著攻。
No departure on a cloud, but 「隱身一旁立」 — the form hidden, standing off to one side. That is precisely an examiner’s posture: during an examination the invigilator does not leave the room, only stops speaking. 守吾職責 is keeping to what falls within one’s own charge, and 助道攻 is helping everyone press forward in the work of the Dao. And that 攻 is the very character of the second line of the main teaching, 「探討真諦更專攻」; the same character clasps the end back to the beginning, which amounts to saying: you press the work, and I stand alongside pressing too.
本訓二十七聯,從一句總綱起。「早服謂之重積德」出自《道德經》第五十九章,「大盈若沖用不窮」出自第四十五章:要早,也要虛。積德要趁早,不能拖;而積得再厚也不能自滿,容器一滿就再裝不進東西。接著五聯講「今天坐在這裡的是誰」:天賦的明命人人合同抱——「明命」出自《大學》傳一章所引《書經‧太甲》「顧諟天之明命」,是一份交到手上、可以時時照看也可以任其蒙塵的光——而造化把人分散各處,血脈因緣有異有同。兩面要合起來看:外面的差別很大,裡面那一份是一樣的,因為天理本是隨人身降於紅塵時一併賦下的。既然人人都帶著,差別就落在各人的業與愿力上;而不論是聖業還是凡塵日用,要拿出來的都是同一樣東西——誠。
接下來是次第,順著一個人實際會遇到的先後排列。先「束修自好」而後入壇地,是把自己收拾乾淨才走進門;一旦「革面洗心」,用的字是「已不同」——不是將要不同,是已經不同了。再「改惡遷善循至理」,而真道古今難逢。中段是三個「不有」的排比:沒有深厚的佛緣,沒有宿世累積的德功,沒有祖上留下的積修,如何入道、又如何遇上明師?這不是宿命論,是掂分量——今天能坐在這裡,底下有一段很長的、看不見的累積在托著。緊接著一句把責任分得清清楚楚:「道在師傳修在己」——道是傳給你的,修是你自己的事,沒有人能代勞。語氣自此轉緊:性理心法,究竟明白了沒有、走過了沒有?不肯認取自己的真性,就談不上入手,也談不上面無生;「此身不向今生渡」,再等來日,機就難逢了。智士仁人不要逡巡,也不要等順帆風才起航。而不論在聖在凡,考驗都是讓人往上登的階梯——記錄所繫的職司是三天主考,出考題的一方親口說明了考題的用意:不是為了把人分等,是為了把人推上去。隨後眼光就放遠了:天橋、法舟都已搭設,天人共沐法喜,而船不是給一個人坐的——要迎接後繼之來者,使之亦能安住至善。從「明命」起、到「至善」收,正是《大學》自己的次第。
最後一段先立兩道防線:道有宗旨,不可旁騖;道是真能兌現的,不是紙上的畫餅。而守住這一切的辦法卻出人意表——「自信自重還自愛」。這不是自大,恰恰相反:前面那筆極難得的積累,必須配上相稱的態度,一個真正看重自己的人,才捨不得糟蹋自己。再往下是定力:八風不動出自佛家的利、衰、毀、譽、稱、譏、苦、樂,君子固窮出自《論語‧衛靈公》——一佛一儒併成一句,說的其實是同一件事:外面怎麼變,裡面那根定盤針不動。而「立德風」的風,正接下一句《論語‧顏淵》的「風行草偃」:德行的感化不必動手,能起這樣的風化作用,肩上的責任也就重了。於是收在一個踮起腳跟、伸長脖子的姿態(翹企),盼望在座每一位都能貫徹始終——這是整篇語氣最軟的一句。臨別的叮嚀落得很實:規戒要放在心中,謹言慎行要貫徹於二六時中——《碧巖錄》的說法,一天十二個時辰、不分場合,功夫一斷就不算功夫;至於「畢竟升降會不同」,話沒有多說,人人都聽得懂。而最後不是騰雲而去,是「隱身一旁立」——正是執掌考核者的姿態:不出聲,但不離開。全篇圍著一個「根」字轉,而那個字,就落在鎮壇詩「根深者葉茂」的末字上。
Twenty-seven couplets, opening on a two-part rule that governs everything after it. To submit early is what is called laying up virtue layer upon layer comes from chapter 59 of the 道德經; the greatest fullness looks empty, and its use is never used up from chapter 45. Early, and empty: do not put off the accumulating, and do not let it show — a vessel already full can take nothing more. Five couplets then establish who is in the room. What everyone holds in common is the bright mandate Heaven endowed — the Great Learning’s 明命, by way of the Book of Documents’ keep constant watch on Heaven’s bright mandate — a light handed over that can be attended to or left to gather dust. Around that common light, creation scatters people into every place, and bloodline and conditioned affinity differ, and are the same. The two halves belong together: what differs is outward, and what is held within is one, because Heaven’s principle was endowed into the body as the body came down into the dust. Since everyone carries it, the difference falls to each person’s own work and vow — and whether the matter at hand is a sacred one or an everyday one, what is brought to it is the same sincerity.
The instructions then arrive in the order a person actually meets them. Discipline yourself and keep yourself clean before the threshold; once inside, the face changed and the heart washed — and the tense is 已不同, not you will be different but you are already not the same. Reform what is bad, move toward what is good, follow the ultimate principle: the true Dao is hard to come upon in any age. At the centre stands a hammering triple negative — were there not the deep affinity with the Buddha, were there not the merit heaped up across former lives, were there not the cultivation your forebears left standing, how could you have entered the Dao at all, or met an enlightened master? This is not fatalism but a weighing: you are seated here on capital you did not raise. And then the line that turns that comfort into a demand — the Dao lies in the master’s transmitting; the cultivating lies in you. Half of it was given; the other half cannot be. The pressure rises from there: the heart-method of nature and principle — understood, and walked? Refuse to take up your own true nature and there is nothing to say about where to lay hold, or about facing the Unborn; and if this body is not ferried across in this present life, the moment will be hard to meet again. Do not hang back hesitating, and do not wait for a following wind in the sail. Whether in sacred affairs or worldly ones, the trials are the stair you climb by — and since the record attributes this teaching to the Chief Examiner of the Three Heavens, the side that sets the examinations is here saying plainly what they are for: not to sort you, but to move you. The imagery turns generous at once — the bridge to Heaven raised, the Dharma-boat set in place, Heaven and humankind alike wearing the face of Dharma-joy — and the boat is not for one passenger: welcome those who come after, and let them too come to rest in the highest good. From the bright mandate to the highest good is the Great Learning’s own arc, laid across the whole teaching.
The close guards the road against two failures and then asks for something unexpected. The failures are dispersion — the Dao has one governing aim, so do not go chasing off to the side — and unreality: this is not empty words, not a cake painted on paper, which cannot feed anyone. Against both: trust yourself, respect yourself, and cherish yourself besides. Not self-importance but its opposite — something that difficult to have come by cannot be held cheaply by the one carrying it. Then steadiness, built from two traditions in a single line: unmoved by the eight winds (gain and loss, disgrace and honor, praise and blame, pleasure and pain) and able to hold firm when hemmed in, which is the Analects’ 君子固窮. Whatever the weather outside, the needle inside does not swing. And the wind of virtue such a person raises blows straight into the next line, the Analects’ the wind passes and the grass bends — influence of that kind needs no force, and carries a correspondingly heavy charge. The teaching’s softest moment follows: neck craned, heels lifted, hoping every one of you carries it through from first to last. The parting instruction is deliberately small — set these rules and cautions down inside your hearts, and be careful in speech and conduct 二六時中, through all twelve double-hours, day and night, since practice with an off-shift is not practice. On who rises and who falls, nothing further is said, and nothing needs to be. The last posture is not an ascent but a stepping aside: hidden, standing off to one side, keeping to the duty — which is exactly how an examination is invigilated, silently and without leaving. The whole teaching turns on one word, 根, root — and that word carries the speaker’s own name at the end of its line, 根深者葉茂.